Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Researchers discover evidence of premonition


Researchers discover evidence of premonition


By Stacey Pounsberry | October 24, 2012


Credit: Flickr


Researchers at Northwestern University say that our body may be able to sense future events without any conscious clues.

According to an analysis performed by researchers at Northwestern University, in collaboration with other institutions, our bodies may be psychic.

The study, “Predictive Physiological Anticipation Preceding Seemingly Unpredictable Stimuli: A Meta-Analysis,” recently published in Frontiers in Perception Science, analyzes the results of 26 studies published between 1978 and 2010.

The studies examined used either randomly ordered presentations of arousing versus neutral stimuli, or a process of guessing tasks with correct versus incorrect feedback. Results were measured in terms of physical activity in the skin, heart, blood, eyes, and brain. The surprising results: Even if we can’t consciously express future events, our bodies subconsciously anticipate them.

“What hasn’t been clear is whether humans have the ability to predict future important events even without any clues as to what might happen,” said Julia Mossbridge, lead author of the study and research associate in the Visual Perception, Cognition and Neuroscience Laboratory at Northwestern in a statement. Co-authors of the study include Patrizio Tressoldi of the Università di Padova, Padova, Italy, and Jessica Utts of the University of California, Irvine.

This phenomenon is sometimes called a presentiment, or even a premonition, but Ms. Mossbridge said the research does not show whether or not people are really sensing the future, or just anticipating the supposedly random process based on minute clues.

“I like to call the phenomenon ‘anomalous anticipatory activity,’” Ms. Mossbridge said. “The phenomenon is anomalous, some scientists argue, because we can’t explain it using present-day understanding about how biology works; though explanations related to recent quantum biological findings could potentially make sense.” Further research in quantum biology might even be able to describe how to exploit such biology, or at least become aware of them.

Further explaining the term describing the anomaly, Ms. Mossbridge said, “It’s anticipatory because it seems to predict future physiological changes in response to an important event without any known clues, and it’s an activity because it consists of changes in the cardiopulmonary, skin and nervous systems.”

Although researchers know that it occurs, they don’t know precisely how it happens. Therefore, anomalous anticipatory activity may be difficult to test.

Let’s say, for example, you are playing a video game at work with your headphones on. The study suggests that with a heightened awareness and a little luck, you may be able to get away with it.

“[Our] analysis suggests that if you were tuned into your body, you might be able to detect these anticipatory changes between two and 10 seconds beforehand and close your video game,” Ms. Mossbridge said. “You might even have a chance to open that spreadsheet you were supposed to be working on. And if you were lucky, you could do all this before your boss entered the room.”

Grandmothers responsible for human longevity


Grandmothers responsible for human longevity


Posted on October 24, 2012 - 08:01 by Kate Taylor
http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/67061-grandmothers-responsible-for-human-longevity

The helpfulness of grandmothers is the reason humans don't die in their thirties the way chimpanzees do, new research shows - and may even explain our bigger brains.

Computer simulations show that with only a little grandmotherly care, animals with chimpanzee lifespans evolve to reach a human level in less than 60,000 years.

"Grandmothering was the initial step toward making us who we are," says Kristen Hawkes of the University of Utah.

The simulated creatures were given an initial lifespan of 25 years from reaching adulthood. But after 24,000 to 60,000 years of grandmothers caring for grandchildren, the creatures reaching adulthood lived another 49 years, just like human hunter-gatherers.

The long-standing 'grandmother hypothesis' says that when grandmothers help feed their grandchildren after weaning, their daughters can produce more children at shorter intervals. Thus, a few ancestral females who lived long enough to become grandmothers passed their longevity genes to more descendants.

Bigger brains have also been suggested as an explanation for human longevity. Crucially, though, the model made no assumption about brain size, showing that the grandmother effect was enough all on its own. Indeed, says Hawkes, it may itself explain increasing brain size.

"Grandmothering gave us the kind of upbringing that made us more dependent on each other socially and prone to engage each other's attention," she says, giving rise to "a whole array of social capacities that are then the foundation for the evolution of other distinctly human traits, including pair bonding, bigger brains, learning new skills and our tendency for cooperation."

That's a lot to thank your grandma for.

10 Things You Must Give Up To Move Forward


Stephen Covey: 10 Quotes That Can Change Your Life


Retrirved via http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2012/07/16/the-7-habits/2/ Article by Kevin Kruse of Forbes

Stephen Covey: 10 Quotes That Can Change Your Life


Stephen Covey will be remembered most as the author of The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, which sold over 25 million copies. It’s been many years since I read “the habits” but I was delighted recently when I learned that my 8th grade daughter read The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Teens in school. Although they weren’t completely original thoughts, the catchy labels he gave the habits made them memorable:

Habit 1: Be Proactive
Habit 2: Begin with the End in Mind
Habit 3: Put First Things First
Habit 4: Think Win-Win
Habit 5: Seek First to Understand
Habit 6: Synergize
Habit 7: Sharpen the Saw

Below are 10 quotes from Stephen Covey that have the power to completely change the direction of one’s life.

1) The key is not to prioritize what’s on your schedule, but to schedule your priorities.

2) The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.

3) Live out of your imagination, not your history.

4) Trust is the glue of life. It’s the most essential ingredient in effective communication. It’s the foundational principle that holds all relationships.

5) Most of us spend too much time on what is urgent and not enough time on what is important.

6) I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions.

7) You have to decide what your highest priorities are and have the courage—pleasantly, smilingly, nonapologetically, to say “no” to other things. And the way you do that is by having a bigger “yes” burning inside. The enemy of the “best” is often the “good.”

8) I teach people how to treat me by what I will allow.

9) Love is a verb. Love – the feeling – is the fruit of love the verb or our loving actions. So love her.
10)   Live, love, laugh, leave a legacy.
________________________

Kevin is a NY Times bestselling author and his latest book is Employee Engagement 2.0.

He is also a serial entrepreneur and angel investor, who builds and sells companies with a talent-first strategy.

Kevin loves to connect with readers. Grab his newsletter atkevinkruse.com, like his FB page, and connect on LinkedIn.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Drones: What Wasn't Asked at the Debate

Sourced via http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-v-santore/drones-what-wasnt-asked-a_b_2005552.html


John V. Santore

GET UPDATES FROM JOHN V. SANTORE





Drone warfare was the subject of only one question posed by Bob Schieffer at the third presidential debate:


MR. SCHIEFFER: Let me ask you, Governor, because we know President Obama’s position on this, what is — what is your position on the use of drones?

This question was not entirely without utility, because in his response, Mitt Romney stated the following:
MR. ROMNEY: Well, I believe that we should use any and all means necessary to take out people who pose a threat to us and our friends around the world. And it’s widely reported that drones are being used in drone strikes, and I support that entirely and feel the president was right to up the usage of that technology and believe that we should continue to use it to continue to go after the people who represent a threat to this nation and to our friends.

In a campaign designed to highlight differences between the parties' candidates, a demonstration of the parity between those candidates on this critical issue is valuable.

That said, Schieffer clearly missed an excellent opportunity to push Obama and Romney in a way that would have educated voters and revealed the candidates' thought process concerning a crucially important topic. Here is a list of relevant questions that could have been asked of either Romney or Obama:

1) Why has the administration fought the ACLU's efforts to make America's use of drones more transparent, and what justifies its opposition?

2) The Obama administration has authorized hundreds of drone strikes in Pakistan alone, resulting in the deaths of numerous civilians. Why is it justifiable to kill such a large number of civilians in the name of protecting civilians from terrorism?

3) Did John Brennan lie when he claimed in June , 2011 that U.S. counter-terrorism activities had not resulted in “a single collateral death" during the previous year, or was he employing a controversial accounting method (see 6 below)?

4) Are so-called "double-tap" drone strikes morally justifiable, considering that the United States has criticized terrorist groups for using the tactic?

5) Can the administration (or Romney) guarantee the accuracy of "signature" strikes used against targets “even when the identity of those who could be killed is not known"?

6) Can the administration (or Romney) defend its practice of counting “all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants" as revealed by Jo Becker and Scott Shane in the New York Times last May?

7) How does the administration (or Romney) view the September report authored jointly by scholars at Stanford and NYU arguing that America's use of drones "undermine[s] respect for the rule of law and international legal protections and may set dangerous precedents," as well as inflicting terror upon Pakistani civilians?

8) How does the administration (or Romney) respond to the September statements of Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar, who argued that America's use of drones in her country was (in its current form) "illegal" and fostered anti-American sentiment among the Pakistani population?

Multiple top-ranking administration officials have defended the morality and legality of America’s use of drones, including Harold Koh, Jeh C. Johnson, Eric Holder, and John Brennan. As such, Schieffer was correct to say that Obama's position on their use is known (i.e., he favors that use).

However, it is also true that the president himself has spoken only sparingly in public about his drone program, and his administration has not been forthcoming regarding the program's details. (As mentioned before, the ACLU's transparency efforts have been opposed, and the officials mentioned above have defended drones in largely theoretical terms).

It is highly unlikely the average citizen understands how this weapon has been used by the White House, which would mean it is equally unlikely the average citizen is familiar with the moral and legal questions raised by its use.

There is no reason why President Obama shouldn't have been asked anything about his use of drones during this, the campaign's only foreign policy debate. And there is no reason why Schieffer should have permitted Romney to offer platitudinous support for the administration's policies without asking him to further justify that support.

Schieffer's question, therefore, represented another example of why even our highest-level political debates are routinely of limited use.



Follow John V. Santore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnvsantore  
FOLLOW POLITICS

Anonymous going to lauch wikileaks like project called TYLER


Anonymous going to lauch wikileaks like project called TYLER

POSTED BY MOHIT KUMAR on 10/23/2012 10:42:00 AM | SAVE AS PDF




International hacker group Anonymous is going to create a WikiLeaks competitor scandalous leak portal called Tyler, for the publication of secret information from governments of various countries. One of the group’s members, who specified that he is representing the collective, spoke about the TYLER project and the rift with WikiLeaks in an email interview with the Voice of Russia.

They have scheduled this new project to December 21 this year. According to the hacker, who requested anonymity, the conflict between Anonymous and the website of Julian Assange revolves around the forced funding techniques and lack of transparency around money to WikiLeaks.


So far Anonymous defends WikiLeaks and Assange personally and supported the mission of the site to share information, news and classified information with the public. They even helped to publish more than 2 million emails, known as the Syrian file.

Since Assange has repeatedly threatened to close the WikiLeaks, hackers have decided to create their own platform for publishing secret government documents. According to Anonymous, Tyler will be a unique service project, as it will not have fixed the server - it will be based on the principle of decentralized or peer to peer network based on the equality of participants. Hackers claim that the attack or close the platform due to this will be impossible.

When asked about the future of WikiLeaks, the anonymous hacker said “Julian has threatened on at least one previous occasion to pull the plug on the project because the fundraising was not meeting his expectations. It was at that time that Anonymous began planning to field our own alternative disclosure platforms. Julian desperately needs WikiLeaks, and he is the only one that can pull the plug on the project. I rather think that so long as he is in dire straits, he will not do so despite any threats from him to the contrary.”

In this case, it is unclear whether the hacker to interview to Russian media reflect the views of the entire community of anonymous or its individual fragments as haktivistite not acting in an organized group with a recognized leader.

Subscribe for Quick Updates - Be the 1st to know about Hackers | Join us on Facebook , Google+ and Twitter
About Author:




Mohit Kumar aka 'Unix Root' is Founder and Editor-in-chief of 'The Hacker News'. He is a Security Researcher and Analyst, with experience in various aspects of Information Security. His editorials always get people thinking and participating in the new and exciting world of cyber security. Other than this : He is an Internet Activist, Strong supporter of Anonymous & Wikileaks. His all efforts are to make internet more Secure. Follow him @ Twitter | LinkedIn | Google | Email


Tags: Anonymous , Anonymous Hackers , hacking news , Julian Assange , leaked the database , Syrian file , TYLER , WikiLeaks

- See more at: http://thehackernews.com/2012/10/anonymous-going-to-lauch-wikileaks-like.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter#_

10 Food Additives That Will Make You Question What You Eat


10 Food Additives That Will Make You Question What You Eat

JOE MARTINO OCTOBER 19, 2012 2
 http://www.collective-evolution.com/2012/10/19/10-food-additives-that-will-make-you-question-what-you-eat/

What food additives are in your daily diet and should you be rethinking eating foods that contain them?

When it comes to food additives they are generally anything but natural in both their make up as well as why they are used. Food additives are usually added to help with processing, packaging and preserving foods. When you are at the grocery store, have you ever realize there are quite a few foods that can sit on the shelf for quite a while? Even things like processed meats seem to last for quite a while in the store and then your fridge, seems a little unnatural doesn’t it? What is tough to swallow is the average north american family spends about 80% of their food budget on processed foods! The worst part of this statistic is the health consequences.

Let’ have a look at some of the top food additives to avoid:

1. Monosodium Glutamate (MSG / E621)

We have all heard of this one before, MSG is an amino acid used to enhance flavors in salad dressings, chips, soups, noodle bowls, and many restaurant foods. MSG is known as an excitotoxin, a substance which overexcites cells to the point of damage or death. A number of studies have revealed that regular consumption of MSG may result in adverse side effects which include depression, disorientation, eye damage, fatigue, headaches, and obesity. Another important factor when it comes to MSG is that it effects the neurological pathways of the brain and disengages the “I’m full” function. This is why there can often be weight gain in those consuming MSG.

MSG can be found in: Chinese food (Chinese Restaurant Syndrome ) many snacks, chips, cookies, seasonings, most Campbell Soup products, frozen dinners, alot of noodle bowls, cold cuts (sandwich meat)

2. High Fructose Corn Syrup or Glucose/Fructose


In the US it is known as High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and in Canada Glucose/Fructose. In both countries it is a highly-refined artificial sweetener which has become the number one ingredient to help sweeten foods and beverages. It also is the number one source of calories in north american diets. You can find HFCS (G/F) in almost all processed foods. HFCS packs on the pounds faster than any other ingredient, increases your LDL (“bad”) cholesterol levels, and contributes to the development of diabetes and tissue damage, among other harmful effects. Not only that, the chemical mixtures used in HFCS introduce mercury into the mix which has been proven to cause brain damage in those who consume it.

HFCS or G/f can be found in: most processed foods, breads, candy, flavored yogurts, salad dressings, canned vegetables, cereals

3. Artificial Sweeteners


Aspartame, (E951) also known as Nutrasweet and Equal, is often found in foods labeled “diet” or “sugar free”. Aspartame is not only carcinogenic but is a serious neurotoxin. Aspartame produces Methanol when in the body which then converts into formaldehyde. While it is often believed that formic acid is the issue with Aspartame, it is actually formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is a serious neurotoxin and carcinogen. According to the EPA, Methanol is considered a cumulative poison which means is accumulates in the body and very little is excreted each time it is consumed. and accounts for more reports of adverse reactions than all other foods and food additives combined. Known to erode intelligence and affect short-term memory, the components of this toxic sweetener may lead to a wide variety of ailments including brain tumor, diseases like lymphoma, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue, emotional disorders like depression and anxiety attacks, dizziness, headaches, nausea, mental confusion, migraines and seizures. Acesulfame-K, a relatively new artificial sweetener found in baking goods, gum and gelatin, has not been thoroughly tested and has been linked to kidney tumors. Read more about the dangers of Aspartame here.

Aspartame can be found in: diet or sugar free sodas, diet coke, coke zero, jello (and over gelatins), desserts, sugar free gum, drink mixes, baking goods, table top sweeteners, cereal, breathmints, pudding, kool-aid, ice tea, chewable vitamins, toothpaste

4. Common Food Dyes


Common food dyes are not only found in foods but also other products we put on our bodies. Studies show that artificial colorings contribute to behavioral problems in children and lead to a significant reduction in IQ. Alternate studies have also linked food colorings to cancer. Watch out for these ones:

Blue #1 and Blue #2 (E133)

Banned in Norway, Finland and France. May cause chromosomal damage

Found in: candy, cereal, soft drinks, sports drinks and pet foods

Red dye # 3 (also Red #40 – a more current dye) (E124)

Banned in 1990 after 8 years of debate from use in many foods and cosmetics. This dye continues to be on the market until supplies run out! Has been proven to cause thyroid cancer and chromosomal damage in laboratory animals, may also interfere with brain-nerve transmission

Found in: fruit cocktail, maraschino cherries, cherry pie mix, ice cream, candy, bakery products and more!

Yellow #6 (E110) and Yellow Tartrazine (E102)

Banned in Norway and Sweden. Increases the number of kidney and adrenal gland tumors in laboratory animals, may cause chromosomal damage.

Found in: American cheese, macaroni and cheese, candy and carbonated beverages, lemonade and more!

5. Trans Fat


While it can be naturally occurring in animals, trans fat is used to enhance and extend the shelf life of food products and is among the most dangerous substances that you can consume. Trans fats can most often found in deep-fried fast foods and processed foods. Trans fats are created from the process of hydrogenation which is why foods like margarine or products that contain other hydrogenated oils are not a good choice for consumption. A number of studies have shown that trans fat increases LDL(“bad) cholesterol levels while decreasing HDL (“good”) cholesterol. This increases the risk of heart attacks, heart disease and strokes, and contributes to increased inflammation, diabetes and other health problems. Oils and fat are now forbidden on the Danish market if they contain trans fatty acids exceeding 2 per cent, a move that effectively bans partially hydrogenated oils.

Trans fats can be found in: margarine, other hydrogenated oils, chips and crackers, baked goods, fast foods

6. BHA and BHT (E320)


Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydrozyttoluene (BHT) are preservatives found in cereals, chewing gum, potato chips, and vegetable oils. This common preservative keeps foods from changing color, changing flavor or becoming rancid. They both effect the neurological system of the brain, contribute to altering behavior and increase the risk of cancer. BHA and BHT are oxidants which form cancer-causing reactive compounds in your body.

Both can be found in: Potato chips, gum, cereal, frozen sausages, enriched rice, lard, shortening, candy, jello

7. Sodium Nitrate/Sodium Nitrite


Sodium nitrate (or sodium nitrite) is used as a preservative, coloring and flavoring founds in favorites such as bacon and hot dogs. Pretty much any processed meat or sandwich meat you buy at the deli will contain Sodium Nitrate. While it sounds harmless, it is actually highly carcinogenic once it enters the human digestive system. Once there, it forms a variety of nitrosamine compounds that find their way into the bloodstream and cause a number of issues with internal organs- the liver and pancreas being most affected. Interestingly enough, this product was motioned to be banned by the FDA but was vetoed by food manufacturers who complained they had no alternative for preserving packaged meat products. It is interesting to note that we destroy health simply to allow industry to flourish.Other than preservation this chemical just happens to turn meats bright red. It helps to make old, dead meats look fresh and pleasing to eat.
Sodium Nitrate/Nitrite can be found in: hotdogs, bacon, ham, luncheon meat, cured meats, corned beef, smoked fish or any other type of processed meat

8. Potassium Bromate


Another one on the list that we are probably all subject to given it is household staple- Potassium Bromate. It is an additive used to increase volume in some white flour, breads, and rolls, potassium bromate is known to cause cancer. Even small amounts in bread can create quite serious problems for humans. It is important to note that glutenous bread blocks nutrient receptors in the intestines which hinders the bodies ability to intake nutrients from other foods.

Potassium Bromate can be found in: breads

9. Sodium Sulfite (E221)


This additive is often why many people have trouble drinking store bought wine. It can also be found in other processed foods. According to the FDA, approximately 1 in 100 people is sensitive to sulfites in food and wine. Individuals who are sulfite sensitive may experience headaches, breathing problems, and rashes. In severe cases, sulfites can actually cause death by closing down the airway altogether, leading to cardiac arrest.

Sodium sulfite can be found in: Wine, processed foods and dried fruit

10. Sulfur Dioxide (E220)


Sulfur additives are toxic and in the United States of America, the Federal Drugs Administration have prohibited their use on raw fruit and vegetables. Adverse reactions include: bronchial problems particularly in those prone to asthma, hypotension (low blood pressure), flushing tingling sensations or anaphylactic shock. It also destroys vitamins B1 and E. Not recommended for consumption by children. The International Labour Organization says to avoid E220 if you suffer from conjunctivitis, bronchitis, emphysema, bronchial asthma, or cardiovascular disease.

Found in: beer, soft drinks, dried fruit, juices, cordials, wine, vinegar, and potato products.
Something to Think About

When we look at the majority of the health problems we experience today, is it not true that the majority, if not all, can be linked directly to the foods we eat? Is it worth debating whether these substances are good or bad when they aren’t natural or naturally occurring in the foods to begin with? Is it possible that maybe our food system has become more about convenience and not about health whatsoever? I think it is important to think about these things as what we eat does in fact affect what happens in our bodies in a HUGE way. Whether or not these substances will heavily affect you in the next 5 or 10 years, one thing is certain, they are not helping out your health in any way and considering most of this stuff is found in processed foods or HIGHLY acidic foods, we shouldn’t be consuming them anyway if good health is our goal.

Sources:

http://www.naturalnews.com/035542_potassium_bromate_baked_goods_cancer.html

http://www.livestrong.com/article/509298-how-nitrates-nitrites-affect-our-bodies/


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/02/24/are-you-or-your-family-eating-toxic-food-dyes.aspx

http://www.naturalnews.com/034272_MSG_monosodium_glutamate.html


http://www.naturalnews.com/032948_high_fructose_corn_syrup_glutaraldehyde.html